<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A most Singular project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://singularityu.org/bloggers/2009/02/a-most-singular-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://singularityu.org/bloggers/2009/02/a-most-singular-project/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:02:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Hunkins</title>
		<link>http://singularityu.org/bloggers/2009/02/a-most-singular-project/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Hunkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularity-university.org/?p=996#comment-38</guid>
		<description>A very, very exciting development.  Congratulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very, very exciting development.  Congratulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laszlo G. Meszaros</title>
		<link>http://singularityu.org/bloggers/2009/02/a-most-singular-project/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Laszlo G. Meszaros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularity-university.org/?p=996#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Nice, but... Technology is advencing on its own. On the other hand, we are losing on the theoretical front. Theories are a mess, especially when we try to combine them. So, if your initiative tries to be theoretical, i.e. essential, instead of further promoting pragmatism, then you are on the right track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, but&#8230; Technology is advencing on its own. On the other hand, we are losing on the theoretical front. Theories are a mess, especially when we try to combine them. So, if your initiative tries to be theoretical, i.e. essential, instead of further promoting pragmatism, then you are on the right track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
